Skip to main content

Spend-based emission factors estimate a data center GPU at roughly 7,500 kg CO₂e. WSP & NVIDIA published the actual product carbon footprint. It's closer to 160.

That's roughly a 45x gap. And it's baked into a lot of Scope 3 inventories right now.

Here's how it happens. EEIO models assume dollars spent correlate with physical production — more spend, more materials, more energy, more emissions. The EPA's supply chain factors for semiconductor manufacturing (NAICS 334413) are 0.215 kg CO₂e per dollar. Apply that to a $35,000 H100 SXM card and you get roughly 7,500 kg CO₂e.

But product-level gross margins on these GPUs are high, almost 90%. Roughly nine out of every ten dollars reflects design IP, market positioning, and scarcity — not silicon, energy, or materials in the fab. EEIO doesn't distinguish between a dollar of copper and a dollar of semiconductor IP. It just multiplies.

The published PCF for the HGX H100 baseboard — ISO 14067-conformant, based on over 90% primary supplier data — is 1,312 kg CO₂e for the full 8-GPU baseboard. Closer to 160 kg per card once you account for the shared components. Not 7,500.

And the gap shifts depending on which NAICS code a company uses. Classify GPU purchases under "Electronic Computer Manufacturing" (334111) instead of semiconductors and the factor drops to 0.058 — but you still get a 12x overestimate. The classification isn't standardized, so two companies buying identical hardware can report very different Scope 3 numbers.

As more product carbon footprints become available for GPUs, memory, and servers, companies that switch from EEIO to LCA-based emission factors will likely see their IT hardware Scope 3 decrease significantly. That's not greenwashing — in this instance it's what happens when you replace a dollar proxy with actual manufacturing data.

Worth noting: this distortion is strongest for high-margin tech hardware. For commodity materials like steel or chemicals, EEIO factors can be reasonably close. The breakdown is specific to products where price has decoupled from physical production intensity.

Jonathan Balsvik

Authored by

Jonathan Balsvik

LCA practitioner focused on the electronics sector. Jonathan has delivered life cycle assessments and product carbon footprints for a range of hyperscalers and companies across the semiconductor value chain.

Connect on LinkedIn